Mum-to-be to ‘choose’ between unborn baby and paedophile husband

An expectant mother has been made to choose between her unborn baby and her husband, who is a convicted paedophile.

BJ7Y2J

by Fiona Day |
Published on

The couple- who have chosen to remain anonymous- first met last year. On their first date, the former primary school teacher told his future partner about his convictions.

Mr X (as he has been dubbed) lost his job after he was convicted of possessing 100,000 indecent images of children. He then served 15 months in prison before attending a sex offenders rehabilitation course.

KATIE HOPKINS BLASTS ROTHERHAM CRIME COMMISSIONER FOLLOWING SEX ABUSE 'COVER UP'

“People talk about rehabilitation and getting back into society, I’ve tried doing that and I’m getting treated like I’m a piece of scum, ” he said.

Mrs X said: “I’ve never been involved with someone with a criminal past. I was shocked and disgusted. He said he understood if I didn’t want to see him again. I said I needed some time to think about it.

IAN WATKINS APPEAL TO LESSEN HIS SENTENCE THROWN OUT BY JUDGES

“A couple of days later he came round and I asked him a lot of questions. I think it’s despicable what he did but he was remorseful when he told me. I understand he is sorry about what he did and I believe he would never do anything again.”

Social services have expressed 'concern' for the unborn child (stock images)
Social services have expressed 'concern' for the unborn child (stock images)

His pregnant wife spoke about her despair over their shocking predicament, in which social services could potentially remove their unborn son from their care.

Social workers allegedly plan to take the matter through the courts once the baby is born, writing in a report that they have ‘concern’ over the child’s safety considering the father’s convictions.

BABYSITTER JAILED FOR HANDING CHILD OVER TO KNOWN PAEDOPHILE

Mrs X is now faced with choosing to stay with her husband or potentially give up her child.

“It’s an impossible choice. No one should be forced to make that kind of choice,” she said.

Mr X added: “We’re pretty much resigned to the fact we’re going to lose him when he’s born.”

A council spokesman said: “We do not comment on individual cases for confidentiality reasons, but our top priority is always the welfare and safety of a child.”

You may also be interested in:* *JIMMY SAVILE'S VICTIMS TOLD THEY WERE 'LUCKY' PAEDOPHILE 'PAID ATTENTION TO THEM'

Just so you know, whilst we may receive a commission or other compensation from the links on this website, we never allow this to influence product selections - read why you should trust us